Wednesday, 31 March 2010
Don't get me wrong, I think its a bit gimmicky, I find it fairly hard to engage with in that I can drift off, go and make a cup of coffee, forget it's on ITV4 and come back to it an hour later safe in the knowledge I haven't really missed much. In many way the IPL in particular is like Hollyoaks. You don't really need to pay attention, you can miss big chunks of it, but you can always pick up the thread and the same old familiar characters, that you thought were long gone are still knocking around. For Tony, the floppy haired guy who runs the cafe, read Shane Warne.
I wonder if this hypothetical administrators' view is what drives ideas like two innings Twenty20 and bright pink cricket balls. They are so excited that one idea got passed and went onto be a success that they are flinging out ideas all over the place to see if one of them will stick.
Musings aside The Guardian today reports that David Collier is assessing whether to cut the championship down to fewer matches in a season. This would obviously either need to be facilitated by cutting the number of teams in each division, most sensibly by introducing 3 divisions, or by just randomly jumbling up the fixtures so that some teams are played at home and away and some just once. The problem is that with 3 regional conferences there would need to be semi-finals and a final, not only would this prove a bit unsatisfactory in terms of deciding the winner, but Durham would have played 14 matches to win the championship instead of 16. Is it really worth the hassle for 8 extra rest days?
A reorganisation in itself though isn't necessarily a bad thing, but I would argue that in any system review the most wasteful and superfluous parts should be cut first. Namely the One Day formats. I've said before, although it might draw in a few hundred more spectators than a CC day there is too much meaningless one day county cricket and it is frankly a match fixing disaster waiting to happen. I hate to besmirch the honest county professionals, but I would be staggered if no-one had taken a bung to send down a few extra wide deliveries, or no-balls for a spreadbet on a pointless one day county match.
Ultimately spectators and fans want the maximum amount of meaningful, absorbing, exciting cricket I just hope the administrators want the same thing.
Posted by Simon at 10:43
Best of The Raggy Bear
Best of the Web
- Brian Halford on CC reorganisation proposals (Blog 31/03/10)
- Lee Daggett's mum steps in to solve stand-off (Post 20/08/08)
- Povey defends Ashes ticket policy at Edgbaston (Post 14/08/08)
- Warwickshire draw brings concern over form (Post 15/08/08)
- Give me 19th century North Tibetan yak hoofprint cave drawings any day! (Mail 04/06/08)
- Can bat, can bowl, can't write (Cricinfo 18/08/08)
- Former Warwickshire captain's historic stand for the professionals (Post 12/08/08)
- Michael Powell first to go as Warwickshire get tough (06/08/08 Mail)
- ECB unveils new Twenty20 tournament (Cricinfo 16/07/08)
- EU ruling could spell end to Kolpaks (Cricinfo 22/07/08)